Legal Opinion

Davis v. Louisville & Nashville R. R.

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided June 10, 1915PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Autauga Circuit Court. Heard before Hon. W. W. Pearson. Action by W. A. Davis against the Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company for damages to goods in transit. From a ruling of the court not shown plaintiff took a nonsuit with bill of exceptions, and appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtPelham, P. J.

The bill of exceptions in this case recites that: “After an argument to the court by both counsel for the plaintiff and for the defendant, the court ruled that the defendant railroad company was liable as a common carrier for the damages done to the goods in transit; that the measure of damages was the difference in the value of the goods at the time of receiving them by the carrier and their value at the time of *201delivery, and that the defendant was not otherwise liable for damages sustained by reason of delay in the delivery by the carrier beyond a reasonable time; that the only liability…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Engle v. PattersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  2. Sellers v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1913
  3. Corn Products Refining Co. v. Dreyfus Bros.Alabama Court of Appeals · 1912

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ex Parte EmersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
  2. Hedden v. WefelAlabama Court of Appeals · 1915
  3. Monroe County Growers' Exchange v. HarperAlabama Court of Appeals · 1925
  4. Sprinkle v. Walter L. Couse CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
  5. Ex Parte EmersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API