Legal Opinion
Carter v. Reichlin Furriers
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided June 10, 1977No. FILE No. 351PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDavid M. Shea, J.
The complaint alleges that the defendant failed to return a fur coat which the plaintiff had delivered for storage during the spring and summer seasons. The trial court denied any recovery on the counts of conversion and recklessness, but rendered a judgment awarding the plaintiff $450 damages for her loss on the count alleging breach of a bailment contract. The defendant has appealed from that judgment on the ground that the storage receipt given to the plaintiff at the time the fur coat was received limited any recovery to a maximum of $100.
Several paragraphs of the draft finding were not…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Finlay v. SwirskySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
- Malone v. SantoraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
- Coupland v. Housatonic R. R. Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1892
- Maynard v. JamesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
- Shulman v. Hartford Public LibrarySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Griffin v. Nationwide Moving & Storage Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Lerner v. BrettschneiderCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
- Connecticut Performing Arts Foundation, Inc. v. BrownDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1985
- Jasphy v. OsinskyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2003