Legal Opinion · Dissent
Cooke v. King
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided September 16, 1936Published
1DissentKelly, J.
Omitting the title of the cause, plaintiffs ’ complaint is as follows:
“Come now the plaintiffs, and for cause of suit against the defendant, as Executor of the Estate of William Parker Olds, deceased, and individually, alleges :
I
“That for many years prior to September 2d, 1911, William Parker Olds and Lillian Cooke Olds were husband and wife, and as such they had accumulated by their joint efforts and together a substantial estate; that plaintiffs herein are the two surviving sisters of said Lillian Cooke Olds.
II
“That on or about the said 2d day of September, 1911, said William Parker Olds…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- In Re the Probate of the Will of KelemanNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Wemme v. First Church of ChristOregon Supreme Court · 1924
- Fellowes v. . DurfeySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
- Bohon v. Barrett's ex'rCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1881
- In Re the Estate of PurcellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.