Colonial Pacific Corp. v. Connecticut National Bank
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
952 F.2d 406
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
COLONIAL PACIFIC CORP., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
CONNECTICUT NATIONAL BANK, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 90-35652.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 6, 1992.*
Decided Jan. 9, 1992.
Before JAMES R. BROWNING, D.W. NELSON and CANBY, Circuit Judges.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Perini Corporation and Brown Brothers, Harriman and Company, Plaintiffs v. The First National Bank of Habersham County, Georgia, the Fulton National Bank of Atlanta, Georgia and Morgan Guaranty Trust Company of New York, New York, Perini Corporation and Brown Brothers, Harriman and Company, Plaintiffs v. The First National Bank of Habersham County, Georgia, and the Fulton National Bank of Atlanta, GeorgiaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1977
- British Caledonian Airways Limited v. First State Bank of Bedford, TexasCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- Lincoln National Bank & Trust Company v. The Bank of Commerce, New York Life Insurance Company v. The Bank of CommerceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- American National Bank v. StanfillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- Eatinger v. First National Bank of LewistownMontana Supreme Court · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Nisenzon v. Morgan Stanley DW, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2008