American Association of Cosmetology Schools v. Richard W. Riley, Secretary of Education
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1DissentReinhardt, Circuit Judge
The majority’s conclusion that AACS’s lawsuit for declaratory relief is barred by the anti-injunction provision of 20 U.S.C. § 1082(a)(2) is simply incorrect. The majority’s alternative holding, that this lawsuit cannot go forward even if § 1082(a)(2) does not apply because AACS failed to exhaust administrative appeals, was not raised below by the Secretary and was therefore waived. Moreover, that holding is contrary to this court’s established rule that exhaustion is not required when the agency’s procedures are alleged to be illegal or unconstitutional. Our rule is particularly applicable…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Barry v. BarchiSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Joseph R. Bolker v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Kenneth Joe Whitten, John Elmer Gaiefsky, Jack Wayne Gish, Richard Lawrence ShimelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- United States v. Floyd Julius Patrin, Sr., United States of America v. Barbara PatrinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Amir Masoud MotamediCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.