Legal Opinion

State v. T. Z.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 30, 2011No. 090767868; A143078PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Appellant was civilly committed to the Mental Health Division of the Department of Human Services after a hearing. ORS 426.070; ORS 426.130. The trial court found that appellant suffered from a mental disorder, which made her unable to provide for her basic personal needs, and was not receiving the care necessary for her health or safety. ORS 426.005(l)(d)(B). Appellant assigns error to that determination, asserting that there is not clear and convincing evidence in the record to support the court’s conclusion that she is unable to provide for her basic needs. The state disagrees and argues…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. BuntingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  2. State v. B. B.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  3. State v. S. T. S.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  4. State v. D. R.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  5. State v. A. M.-M.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. TZCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API