Legal Opinion

Carmickle v. Comm'r

United States Tax Court

Decided June 26, 2012No. Docket No. 27793-09SUnpublished

1Opinion of the Court

SAMUEL CARMICKLE AND PAULINE CARMICKLE, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Carmickle v. Comm'r

Docket No. 27793-09S

United States Tax Court

T.C. Summary Opinion 2012-60; 2012 Tax Ct. Summary LEXIS 59;

June 26, 2012, Filed

PURSUANT TO INTERNAL REVENUE CODE SECTION 7463(b), THIS OPINION MAY NOT BE TREATED AS PRECEDENT FOR ANY OTHER CASE.

Decision will be entered under Rule 155.

Samuel Carmickle and Pauline Carmickle, Pro se.

Martha J. Weber, for respondent.

RUWE, Judge.

RUWE

SUMMARY OPINION

RUWE, Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 1 of the Internal…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Welch v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. New Colonial Ice Co. v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. HIGBEE v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUEUnited States Tax Court · 2001
  4. Indopco, Inc. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Neely v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1985

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API