Legal Opinion
Collins & Armstrong Co. v. United States Insurance
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided June 20, 1894No. 1241PublishedCited by 8 opinions
Error from the County Court of Tarrant.
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHENS, Associate Justice.
Mrs. C. Chambliss being indebted to plaintiff in error in the sum of $245, secured it by mortgage on a piano, which, with other personalty, she caused to be insured by defendant in error.
After the property was burned, in order to appropriate to the payment of this debt that amount of the insurance policy, she executed and delivered to the agent of plaintiff in error the following order:
“Fort Worth, Texas, April 10, 1891.
“Swayne, Allen & Goodell:
“Gentlemen—Please pay to the order of Collins & Armstrong Company $245, balance due them on one Wegman & Co. piano, number…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Rivers v. Wright & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Sovereign Camp, Woodmen of the World v. HaleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909
- Bennie Fuelberg v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2013
- First National Bank v. McGuireSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1899
- Prentice v. Security Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1912
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.