State v. Fogerson
Supreme Court of Missouri
Appeal from Laclede Circuit Court. The facts are set forth sufficiently in the opinion of the court. I. The indictment is sufficient. The evidence offered by the defendant was clearly irrelevant. The instructions as a whole present the law of the case fairly before the jury.
1Opinion of the CourtEwing, Judge
The defendant was indicted, under the fifteenth section of the seventh article of the act concerning crimes and punishments, for disturbing the peace of a neighborhood. The *417offence under the statute consists in wilfully disturbing the peace of any neighborhood, or of any family, by loud and unusual noise, loud and offensive or indecent conversation, or by threatening, quarreling, challenging, or fighting, <fcc.' The indictment charges that the defendant on, &c., at, Ac., did then and there wilfully and unlawfully disturb the peace of a neighborhood, to-wit, the neighborhood and town of…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Agar v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
- Flores v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1950
- State v. FareMissouri Court of Appeals · 1890
- State v. ParkerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1890
- Missouri v. RagsdaleMissouri Court of Appeals · 1894
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.