Legal Opinion · Dissent

Graves v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided October 2, 1984No. 82-94Published

1DissentFerren, Associate Judge

The majority acknowledges that “this case approaches the boundary” of unconstitutional delay. Ante at 1105. In my judgment, the majority strains — unconstitutionally — for affirmance.

I

The plain facts are:

• Appellant was incarcerated in the D.C. Jail, unable to make a $2,500 bond, for the 25 months between arrest and trial. No other charges were pending, and appellant was not serving time for another offense. (A parole detainer relating to a previous conviction was lodged solely because of appellant’s arrest in this case; it was lifted 13 months after arrest.)

• Appellant persistently asserted…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. United States v. MacDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. United States v. MacDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Strunk v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API