Legal Opinion

Meyer v. Dans un Jardin, S.A.

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided April 17, 1987No. 84-2738PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LOGAN, Circuit Judge.

After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R. App.P. 34(a); Tenth Cir.R. 34.1.8(c) and 27.-1.2. The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

In March 1982 plaintiffs, Donna Gates Meyer and Diana Meyer Reynolds, entered into a franchise agreement with defendant Century Franchising Company, an American subsidiary of defendant Dans un Jar-din, S.A., a French corporation. Plaintiffs paid an initial…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Securities and Exchange Commission v. W. J. Howey Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. State Energy Resources Conservation & Development CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Louisiana Pub. Serv. Comm'n v. FCCSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Donna Krenik v. County of Le SueurCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
  2. Securities & Exchange Commission v. ShieldsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
  3. Committee for the First Amendment v. CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
  4. Ellis v. J.R.'s Country Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
  5. Telum, Inc. v. E.F. Hutton Credit Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API