Legal Opinion

Anders v. California State University, Fresno

District Court, E.D. California

Decided March 17, 2021No. 1:21-cv-00179Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TAYLOR ANDERS, et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-00179-AWI-BAM 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR EXPEDITED DISCOVERY 13 v. (Doc. 9) 14 CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, FRESNO, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 Currently before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion for Expedited Discovery. (Doc. 9.) The 19 Court finds the motion suitable for decision without oral argument, and the matter is deemed 20 submitted. For the reasons outlined below, Plaintiffs’ request for leave to conduct expedited 21 discovery…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Semitool, Inc. v. Tokyo Electron America, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2002
  2. American Legalnet, Inc. v. DavisDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2009
  3. United States v. Water Resources Control BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API