Legal Opinion

Florida Parole Commission v. Criner

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 22, 1994No. 93-2811PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The Florida Parole Commission seeks review of an order granting Criner’s petition for writ of mandamus. We affirm that portion of the order concluding that the Commission erred in determining Criner’s salient factor score, and directing that his presumptive parole release date be recalculated accordingly. However, we reverse that portion *52of the order concluding that the Commission erred in classifying Criner’s 1966 rape conviction as a capital felony,1 and directing that it be characterized as a life felony for purposes of determining the offense severity rating.

The entitlement to mandamus…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Coker v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Castle v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1976
  4. Florida League of Cities v. SmithSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
  5. State v. HoganSupreme Court of Florida · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sancho v. JoanosDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  2. State, Office of Attorney General v. ShoreDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
  3. Treacy v. LambertiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API