State Board of Barber Examiners v. Blocker
Supreme Court of Georgia
1ConcurrenceGilbert, J.
This concurrence is based upon the facts alleged in the petition. These facts must be construed most strongly against the pleader. The petition shows that the petitioners for the harsh remedy of injunction have not been molested in any way, either as to their person or property. The suit is instituted plainly and solely for the purpose of restraining a criminal prosecution, expressly inhibited by the Code of 1910, § 5491, and numerous decisions of this court. See dissenting opinion in Dasher v. Valdosta, 172 Ga. 539, 541 (158 S. E. 34); Montgomery & Atlanta Motor Freight Lines v. Georgia…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Montgomery & Atlanta Motor Freight Lines v. Georgia Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Georgia · 1932
- Dasher v. City of ValdostaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931