Legal Opinion · Dissent

Albrecht v. Albrecht

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 2014No. 20130392Published

1DissentCrothers, Justice

[¶ 20] I respectfully dissent. Instead of treating this case as merely an application of N.D.R.Civ.P. 54(b), I would affirm after concluding that the action did not abate, that the district court exercised its discretion and severed the divorce action from the property distribution proceeding and that the district court’s allocation of marital property was not clearly erroneous.

[¶ 21] The majority opinion follows our Rule 54(b) jurisprudence and overlooks the reality that a divorce action and the marital property division cannot always occur simultaneously. Legitimate delays sometimes occur…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kosobud v. KosobudNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Kelly v. KellyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Federal Land Bank of Saint Paul v. WallaceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Anderson v. AndersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Shannon v. ShannonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API