Legal Opinion

Gail Stern v. Department of the Army

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided February 14, 1983No. 20-2004PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRIEDMAN, Circuit Judge.

The petitioner challenges a decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board (“the Board”) that it had no jurisdiction to entertain her appeal from her dismissal as a civilian employee of the Army. We affirm.

I

Between 1978 and 1980, the petitioner, a dependent of a serviceman, was a civilian employee of the Army in various positions in military commissary stores in Germany. She served under three successive appointments. The last appointment, under which she was serving when she was dismissed, was made on January 1, 1980. It was a temporary appointment (i.e., one year or…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Edward Piskadlo v. Veterans' Administration, Merit Systems Protection Board, and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
  2. Eugene Oulvey v. Veteran's AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Neal Kenneth Maddox v. Merit Systems Protection BoardCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
  2. Bridgett L. Burgess v. Merit Systems Protection BoardCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
  3. Richard T. Adams v. Department of Transportation, Faa, Gary S. Baracco v. Department of Transportation, FaaCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  4. Jeffrey S. Stokes v. Federal Aviation AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
  5. Geoffrey J. Waldau v. Merit Systems Protection BoardCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API