Capriulo v. Bankers Life Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1DissentBeasley, Judge
I would agree with the trial court’s ruling on fraud for the reason that there is no allegation in the complaint of any confidential or special or fiduciary relationship nor any evidence to show that one existed so as to make that an issue in the case. Confidential relations are defined in OCGA § 23-2-58. As recognized by the majority here, such a relationship is a threshold requirement for Capriulo’s claim of fraud.
The complaint alleging fraud merely states that Sysco administered the group health plan and was responsible for notifying prospective employees of the terms of both policies, and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Dover v. BurnsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
- Cole v. CatesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- Feltman v. National Bank of Ga.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
- Tucker v. Chung Studio of Karate, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
- Bulmer v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.