Smith v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
*450OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
After a studied consideration of the records, together with the briefs and arguments of counsel, we find nothing sufficiently persuasive to cause us to disturb the orders of the Commonwealth Court in these cases.
The orders 40 Pa.Cmwlth. 1, 396 A.2d 480, 40 Pa.Cmwlth. 11, 396 A.2d 94, 39 Pa.Cmwlth. 404, 395 A.2d 675, 39 Pa. Cmwlth. 408, 395 A.2d 667, 37 Pa.Cmwlth. 73, 388 A.2d 1154, are affirmed.
3Cases cited5 opinions
- Huff v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Mooney v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Katz v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Gulick v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Collins v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
4Cited by7 opinions
- Evans v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Wheelock Hatchery, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Walseth v. L.B. Hartz WholesaleCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- Gould v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Wilson v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.