Legal Opinion

Tavarozzi v. Tavarozzi

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1922PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Action for separation.

1Opinion of the CourtHotchkiss, J.

Plaintiff defaulted at the trial, and her counsel stated in open court that she had directed him to abandon the action. Defendant thereupon gave proof of his counterclaim. On investigation I think that a counter-claim for annulment may not be interposed in an action for a separation. See Civil Practice Act, § 1168; Code Civ. Pro. § 1770; Murphy v. Murphy, 194 App. Div. 395; Ostro v. Ostro, 169 id. 790, 791. In an ordinary civil action where a defective pleading has been interposed but objection thereto has not been taken, it will be deemed to have been waived. But the situation here is…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Murphy v. MurphyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Warshor v. WarshorNew York Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Tober v. ToberNew York Supreme Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API