Legal Opinion

Kinney v. McCall

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1910No. 8565PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Kennan, J., entered October 4, 1909, upon findings in favor of the defendant, dismissing on the merits an action to declare a trust and for an accounting.

1Opinion of the CourtRudkin, C. J.

On the 12th day of August, 1890, William A. Kinney and Emma Kinney, his wife, conveyed lot 6, of block 9, of Havermale’s addition to the city of Spokane Falls, lots 1 and 2, of block 14, of Fairview addition to the city of Spokane Falls, and an undivided one-half interest in the west half of lot 3, of block 9, of the Resurvey and Addition to the city of Spokane Falls, to Lide Gonder, by warranty deed. The deed recited a consideration of five dollars, and that the lot in Havermale’s addition was subject to a mortgage of $2,000, and the half lot in the Resurvey and Addition to a mortgage of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Spaulding v. CollinsWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Babcock v. CollinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Niemann v. Vaughn Community ChurchWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Farrell v. MentzerWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Ramirez v. BellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  4. State Ex Rel. Wirt v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Arnold v. HallWashington Supreme Court · 1913

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API