Legal Opinion

Filgueiras v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 26, 1974No. 73-878PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant was charged by information with unlawful sale of a narcotic drug. There was considerable preliminary skirmishing by counsel for the defendant attempting to secure evidence in the possession of the State Attorney’s office. The pre-trial discovery disclosed that the sale had been made to an informant; that the informant had been wired for sound or his telephone conversations with the defendant had been electronically intercepted. Although police authorities believed they had delivered all of the transcriptions to the State Attorney’s office, counsel for the defendant [from his…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Koptyra v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
  2. Gagnon v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968
  3. State v. RouseDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970
  4. United States v. Leo Joseph Saitta, No. 30761 Summary Calendar. Rule 18, 5 Cir. See Isbell Enterprises, Inc v. Citizens Casualty Co. Of New York, 5 Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part ICourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
  5. Sheridan v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. Del GaudioDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  2. Filgueiras v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API