Legal Opinion · Dissent

Mumphrey v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)

Decided June 22, 1989No. 09-88-073 CRPublished

1DissentBurgess, Justice

While not crucial to the analysis of the case, the majority almost initially makes the following observation: “A startling episode took place in the trial. Apparently, the accused tried to influence or intimidate the accomplice witness Steve Thomas. The district judge and the jury observed this ‘theatre in the round’ or ‘theatre in the pit’ to use trial lawyer’s jargon.” This is the actual occurrence:

[THE COURT:] All right. Now, one point, Mr. Mumphrey, let this be on the record, you got a right to be here and watch this testimony. That’s perfectly appropriate. But at one point I saw you…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Paulus v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
  2. Walker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  3. Crestfield v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
  4. State v. EpsteinSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1903
  5. Bloomer v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API