Legal Opinion

Delaware v. Van Arsdall

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 7, 1986No. 84-1279PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

475 U.S. 673 (1986)

DELAWARE

v.

VAN ARSDALL

No. 84-1279.

Supreme Court of United States.

Argued January 22, 1986

Decided April 7, 1986

CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE

Richard E. Fairbanks, Jr., argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Charles M. Oberly III, Attorney General of Delaware, and Gary A. Myers and Loren C. Meyers, Deputy Attorneys General.

Paul J. Larkin, Jr., argued the cause for the United States as amicus curiae urging reversal. With him on the brief were Acting Solicitor General Fried, Assistant Attorney General Trott, Deputy Solicitor General Frey, and…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Rehnquist; Concurring in the judgment; Dissent · Marshall; Dissent · Stevens.

2Cases cited69 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. SánchezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
  2. United States v. Maria MoeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  3. (HC) Arguello v. MunizDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
  4. (HC) Barkley v. LizarragaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
  5. (HC) Casillas v. Secretary of CorrectionsDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API