Gragg v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the CourtNichols, Judge
In this tax refund case, plaintiffs urge us to hold that § 1251 of the Internal Revenue Code is constitutionally invalid because in computing a taxpayer’s "farm net income” § 1251(e)(2)(B) excludes some gains from calculation of gross income that could otherwise be considered taxable "income” under the sixteenth amendment. Thus, *228according to plaintiffs Congress has arbitrarily denied these gains their character as income, which plaintiffs contend is constitutionally mandated. For the reasons set forth below, we reject plaintiffs’ theory, we hold for the Government and deny plaintiffs’ claim…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Commissioner v. Glenshaw Glass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- United States v. Kirby Lumber CoSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Hoeper v. Tax Comm'n of Wis.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Denman v. SlaytonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Avery v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1936
3Cited by2 opinions
- Armendaris Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1979
- Armendaris Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1979