Legal Opinion

People v. Kirk

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 24, 1992No. B061114PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HINZ, J.

Introduction

Following a pretrial ruling to strike a prior conviction alleged against the defendant as constitutionally invalid, the People seek to appeal this ruling before a judgment of conviction. We find that the People may appeal the order, but remand the case to the appellate department of the superior court for review of the inferior court’s ruling.

An amended misdemeanor complaint filed on April 3, 1991, alleged that on September 10, 1990, defendant Brent Curtis Kirk committed the crime of driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs in violation of Vehicle Code…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. In Re TahlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  3. People v. OrinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  4. People v. BurkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  5. People v. DrakeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fadelli Concrete Pumping, Inc. v. Appellate DepartmentCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  2. State v. KoseckNevada Supreme Court · 1996
  3. People v. DaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API