Legal Opinion

Weiss v. Duro Chrome Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided October 14, 1953No. 14650PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARDNER, Chief Judge.

This was an action brought by appellant to recover compensation in the form of commissions alleged to be due him under a written contract between appel-lee and appellant. The parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court. In April, 1947, plaintiff and defendant entered into a written contract by the terms of which defendant employed plaintiff to solicit orders for the defendant’s products in the territory therein described upon a commission basis under a schedule therein contained. The contract contained the following provision :

“We (defendant) reserve…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Rau Const. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942
  2. Valley Shoe Corp. v. StoutCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
  3. L. G. Balfour Co. v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  4. McGregor v. J. A. Ware Construction Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1905
  5. Petersen v. Chicago, Great Western Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Michael Simpson, D/B/A Delta Enterprises v. Norwesco, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
  2. Wright & Seaton, Inc. v. PrescottDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  3. Moody v. BogueCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1981
  4. Ralph Green and William L. Groesbeck, Doing Business as Ralph Green and W. L. Groesbeck v. Harry F. DingmanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1956
  5. Fenberg v. GogginMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API