Legal Opinion

Texas Commerce Bank-Beaumont, N.A. v. Sherpolk Joint Venture (In Re Sherpolk Joint Venture)

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas

Decided May 9, 1986No. 19-31074Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING SANCTIONS PURSUANT TO RULE 11 OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE AGAINST SHERPOLK JOINT VENTURE AND DANIEL DROR

EDWARD J. RYAN, Bankruptcy Judge.

On April 16, 1986, 777 S.H. Corporation filed its motion for sanctions against Sher-polk Joint Venture and its agent, consultant, (either or both), Daniel Dror, requesting that sanctions be assessed against Sherpolk Joint Venture and against Daniel Dror in the amounts of $33,277.36 expenses and $6,815.00 attorney’s fees incurred by 777 S.H. Corporation.

The motion sets forth in pertinent part:

“1. Sherpolk has…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Nemeroff v. AbelsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
  3. Kinee v. Abraham Lincoln Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
  4. Mcconnell v. CritchlowCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  5. In re 1801 Restaurant, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API