Brown v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Bell, Chief Judge.
Where the informer’s hearsay is relied on to furnish probable cause, two tests must be met: (1) The reasons for the informer’s reliability must be shown and (2) the affidavit must state how the informer obtained the information or must describe the criminal activity in such detail that the magistrate may know it is more than a casual rumor circulating in the underworld or an accusation based merely on the individual’s general reputation. Sams v. State, 121 Ga. App. 46 (172 SE2d 473). The affidavit here was sufficient to show that the informer was reliable. The question is…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Draper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- United States v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Merino v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1973
- Sams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Fears v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
- Brown v. RickettsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
- Braden v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
- Moreland v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
- Wright v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.