Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Caccamo

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided October 3, 1972PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nathan R. Sobel, S-;

In several recent decisions (most recently Matter of Transillo, N. Y. L. J., June 30, 1972, p. 14, col, 2) this court has stated that where a choice of law problem arises with respect to the ‘ ‘ distribution ’ ’ of the proceeds of a wrongful death recovery, invariably New York law (EPTL 5-4.4) will govern. Many choice of law problems in wrongful death actions in which New York law does not apply, do arise of course with respect to the “ recovery ” aspects of such actions — viz.: limita^ tions on amounts of recovery, vicarious liability of owners, inter-spousal immunity,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Richards v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Landers v. LandersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
  3. H. Grady Gore, Jr., as Under the Last Will and Testament of Gordon Dean, Deceased v. Northeast Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
  4. Shaker v. ShakerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
  5. Davis v. MargolisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Tyminski v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
  2. Matter of Estate of BruckIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Anderson v. SAM AIRLINESDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1996
  4. Shenandoah v. City of PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. In re the Estate of LaydenNew York Surrogate's Court · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API