Legal Opinion

Bodley v. Hernden

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided October 26, 1820PublishedCited by 7 opinions

^ appeai j-rm a decree Qj ⅛ Mason circuit court.

1Opinion of the Court

Judge Mills

delivered the opinion.

Bodley having obtained a decree in the court below, sustaining his entry, a survey was directed on the return of the report, by which the interference was shewn, the question arose between the true and magnetic meridian, or rather between his old line and the present direction of the magnet. The entry of Bodley calls to run from his beginning north, twelve hundred and sixty-four poles and nine-tenths of a pole, and thence east, twenty-five hundred and twenty nine poles and eight-tenths. This line, running cast, produces the interference with the defendants, a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Vance v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1813

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re Bashas' Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Arizona · 2010
  2. (HC) Hanrahan v. WardenDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
  3. Hanrahan v. WardenDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2024
  4. May v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1936
  5. Saada v. GolanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2020

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API