Legal Opinion
Walker v. Figarola
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided March 9, 2011No. 3D09-2342PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
On Motion for Rehearing
ROTHENBERG, Judge.
We grant Jaime A. Figarola’s (“Figaro-la”) motion for rehearing, withdraw this Court’s opinion dated October 27, 2010, and issue the following opinion in its stead.
William P. Walker III and Gemma M. Walker, his wife (“the Walkers”), appeal the trial court’s order granting Figarola’s motion for judgment on the pleadings. Because we agree with the trial court that the Walkers’ second amended complaint fails to state a cause of action against Figarola for civil theft or conversion, we affirm.
Initially, the Walkers filed a two-count complaint against…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gasparini v. PordomingoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
- Ginsberg v. Lennar Florida HoldingsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
- Hotels of Key Largo, Inc. v. RHI HOTELSDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
- Futch v. HeadDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
- Masvidal v. OchoaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- IberiaBank v. Coconut 41, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2013
- Lesti v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2013
- Talisman Capital Alternative Investments Fund, Ltd. v. Mouttet (In re Mouttet)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 2013
- Wolfe v. ForemanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
- Buade v. Terra GroupDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.