Legal Opinion

In re Hall

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 6, 2003PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Per Curiam.

Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 1993. He maintains an office for the practice of law in the Town of Kinderhook, Columbia County.

Petitioner moves for an order confirming the report of a Referee filed after a hearing to the extent that the report sustained charges, and disaffirming that portion of the report that did not sustain charges. In opposition to the motion, respondent argues that various charges should be dismissed, but he also admits the facts of some charges.

We find respondent guilty of the following professional misconduct in violation of this…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re DavisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. In re DolingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. In re HickeyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re GallagherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  2. In re GokhaleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  3. In re HallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  4. In re HallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API