Legal Opinion

Brent v. Hoch

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 6, 1961PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In a proceeding under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act, to review the determination of respondent, Commissioner of Mental Hygiene, to take certain lands in Suffolk County for the purpose of erecting and maintaining thereon a State school for retarded children, pursuant to the provisions of section 46 of the Mental Hygiene Law, petitioners appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated October 6, 1960, granting the cross motion of respondent to dismiss the petition for insufficiency. Order affirmed, without costs. Since the action by respondent was legislative in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Rindge Co. v. County of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Bragg v. WeaverSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  3. People Ex Rel. Trustees of Jamaica v. Board of SupervisorsNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  4. Matter of City of New York (Ely Avenue)New York Court of Appeals · 1916
  5. Matter of Long Island R.R. Co. v. HylanNew York Court of Appeals · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Luther Knight v. State of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
  2. Nassau Shores Civic Ass'n v. ColbyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API