National Federation of Republican Assemblies v. United States
District Court, S.D. Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
VOLLMER, Senior District Judge.
Presently before the court is the defendant United States of America’s “Motion to Dismiss” (Doc. 15), as well as the plaintiffs’ “Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss” (Doc. 19), and the “Reply of United States of America to Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss” (Doc. 23).
For the reasons put forth below, the government’s motion is due to be granted in part and denied in part.
I. BACKGROUND
This is an action by the plaintiffs 1 seeking a declaratory judgment finding that the recently enacted Public Law 106-230, codified at 26 U.S.C.…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Cannon v. University of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Mobile Republican Assembly v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
- Liberty University v. Timothy GeithnerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011
- State v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2018
- National Federation of Republican Assemblies v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2002
- Liberty University v. Timothy GeithnerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.