Legal Opinion

American Hallmark Insurance Company of Texas v. Roadenbaugh

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Decided December 3, 2019No. 5:19-cv-01107Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA AMERICAN HALLMARK ) INSURANCE COMPANY OF ) TEXAS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) -vs- ) Case No. CIV-19-1107-F ) JIMMEY ROADENBAUGH, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ORDER The court has a duty to inquire into its own jurisdiction. Tuck v. United Services Automobile Association,

859 F.2d 842

(10th Cir. 1988). The complaint purports to base this court’s subject matter jurisdiction on diversity of citizenship pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332. The complaint identifies each of the defendants as a resident of Oklahoma, but the complaint does not…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Freeport-McMoRan Inc. v. K N Energy, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Teddy Ray DyerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
  3. James H. Crowley v. Richard D. Glaze, D/B/A Tomichi Village Restaurant and LoungeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
  4. D. H. Walden v. Broce Construction Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966
  5. Leroy Tuck v. United Services Automobile AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API