United States v. Jorge Negrete-Gonzales, United States of America v. Rogelio Mendoza-Barajas
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
EUGENE A. WRIGHT, Circuit Judge:
The two defendants here may or may not have conspired to sell cocaine, but a trial rife with error denied them their fundamental right to make the government prove its case. The district court arbitrarily struck the testimony of the key defense witness, permitted the government’s ill-advised inquiry into the defendants’ post-arrest silence, and misinstructed the jury. We reverse and remand for a new trial, with the expectation that these errors will be corrected.
I
The two defendants, Rogelio Mendoza-Barajas (Mendoza) and Jorge Negrete-Gon-zalez (Negrete), were…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Illinois v. KrullSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Fletcher v. WeirSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by109 opinions
- United States v. Sean HowellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. BasherCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Jose Lombera-CamorlingaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Joaquin Garcia, Joaquin Garcia v. Margaret C. Hambrick, Warden, Metropolitan Detention Center Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Filiberto Guzman-BrunoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
104 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.