Crotts v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BELCHER, Judge.
The offense is the possession of a narcotic drug, marihuana; the punishment, ten years.
The appellant did not comply with the requirements of Sec. 9 of Art. 40.09, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P., in that his brief fails to separately set forth with specificity each ground of error of which he desires to complain on appeal.
The following matters will be considered under the provisions of Section 13 of Art. 40.09, supra:
The appellant attacks the affidavit to the search warrant on the ground that it is insufficient to show probable cause for the issuance of the warrant.
The affidavit…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bosley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1967
- Acosta v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1966
- Sutton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1967
- Slaton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1967
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hinkle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1969
- Hammond v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
- Aguilar v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1969
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
- State v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1971
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.