Legal Opinion

Reusens v. Arkenburgh

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 3, 1909PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal by the defendant, Oliver M. Arlcenburgh, from a .judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Hew York on the 24th day of June, 1909, upon the verdict- of a jury rendered by direction of the court, and also from an order entered in said clerk’s office on the same day denying the defendant’s motion for a new trial made upon the minutes.

1Opinion of the Court

Laughlin, J.:

The plaintiff has recovered on an acount stated for moneys loaned and advanced which included compound interest, being interest upon the interest in the account, as stated from year to year. The complaint contains two counts for the recovery of the same amount. The first count was for moneys loaned to and paid out for the defendant. The second count was on an account stated, evidently on the same liability. At the opening of the _trial counsel for the defendant moved to dismiss the first cause of action'. The court ' thereupon stated that the first count in -the complaint was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Young v. . HillNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  2. Cass v. . HigenbotamNew York Court of Appeals · 1885

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Rourke v. Fred H. Thomas AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. In Re Realty Associates Securities CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1946
  3. Spain v. TalcottAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
  4. R.F. Schiffmann Associates, Inc. v. Baker & Daniels LLPAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  5. First National Bank v. GiddenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API