Legal Opinion

Simpson v. McConahay

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided March 4, 2025No. 3:23-cv-00943Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION Charles Richard Simpson, Case No. 3:23-cv-943 Petitioner, v. ORDER Harold May, Warden, Respondent. Before me is the March 26, 2024 Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Carmen E. Henderson, recommending I dismiss pro se Petitioner Charles Richard Simpson’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus under

28 U.S.C. § 2254

because his petition was not filed within the one-year statute of limitations and Simpson is not entitled to equitable tolling.1 (Doc. No. 14). Under the relevant statute, “[w]ithin fourteen days…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. United States v. W. R. Walters, United States of America v. Two Hundred Sixty-Two FirearmsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
  3. Kathy Thomas v. Dorothy ArnCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
  4. Bonifacia Carrasco v. Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API