Legal Opinion

King v. Pardee

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 11, 1878No. 173PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the • Western District of Pennsylvania. The facts are fully stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bradley

This is an action of ejectment brought in the court below in June, 1871, by James Turnbull, Jr., a subject of Mexico, against Ario Pardee, a citizen of Pennsylvania, to recover- one undivided eighth part of a tract of land in Hazel Township, Luzerne County, Pennsylvania, containing four hundred and thirty-nine and one-half acre's, known as the Mary/Kunkle tract. Turnbull having died pendente lite>, King and other heirs-at-law were substituted in his stead. Edward' Roberts and the executors of Algernon S. Roberts, deceased, were admitted to defend with Pardee as his landlord of the premises in…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Page v. BurnstineSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railroad v. State ex rel. GreenwoodIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Speidell v. HenriciDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1883
  4. Earle v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  5. Veeder v. VeederSupreme Court of Iowa · 1918

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API