Legal Opinion

Cole v. Lee's Executors

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 15, 1889PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from a decree of the court of chancery founded on the opinion reported in Lee v. Cole, 17 Stew. Eq. 318.

1Opinion of the Court

*780The opinion of the court was delivered by

Magie, J.

The bill in this cause was filed by Daniel H. Lee, a judgment ■creditor, the execution on whose judgment had been returned unsatisfied, against Mulford Cole, the judgment debtor, and various grantees and assignees of his property. It charged that Cole’s conveyances to them had been made and accepted with intent to defraud his creditors.

The defendants charged with fraud answered the bill and denied the charge.

Upon the proofs taken, the court below held that some of the transactions impugned were tainted with the fraud charged, and decreed…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Vigne v. VigneNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1925
  2. Fowler v. ScottNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
  3. Wernick v. WernickNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API