Legal Opinion
Bryson v. Warden, Balto. City Jail
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided April 22, 1980No. [No. 140, September Term, 1979.]PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
We shall here affirm the denial of release under the writ of habeas corpus to William Bryson, Jr.
The State of Virginia desires to place Bryson on trial on a charge of felonious assault. It made a request to the Governor of Maryland for Bryson’s rendition. A warrant was duly issued.
Pursuant to Code (1957, 1978 Repl. Vol.) Art. 41, § 25, a part of the Uniform Criminal Extradition Act, Bryson sought the writ of habeas corpus. The proceeding was docketed in the Baltimore City Court. He swore to the petition under the penalties of perjury. Attached to it was a statement of facts in which Bryson…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Michigan v. DoranSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Koprivich v. Warden of the Baltimore City JailCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
- Shields v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
- Solomon v. Warden, Baltimore City JailCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
- State Ex Rel. Channell v. MurphyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re Complaint in Habeas Corpus of RoweOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1982
- Utt v. Warden, Balto. City JailCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1981
- Burton v. Mumford, WardenCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2014