Legal Opinion · Dissent

Commonwealth, Department of State v. Stecher

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 20, 1984No. 53 M.D. Appeal Docket, 1983Published

1DissentZappala, Justice

I dissent from the majority’s finding that the furloughs of appellees were valid.

Appellees, Eugene H. Stecher, Leroy L. Craig, Clayton O. Scott, and Theodore J. Charney, held the civil service position of Administrative Officer II. As noted by the majority, they performed duties related to occupational licensing boards under jurisdiction of the Bureau of Professional and Occupational Affairs. Such duties including budgeting, legislative review, complaint processing, drafting of regulations and procedures, rationalization of operations, and general supervisory tasks. The Bureau is responsible…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. Commonwealth v. MagrathCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Silverman v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Vovakes v. Commonwealth, Department of TransportationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Forbes v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API