Legal Opinion

Meretzky v. Wolff

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 15, 1928PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. We think that plaintiff is entitled to the examination sought and that her practice in serving a notice to produce upon the examination the books and papers in question, so as to permit secondary evidence of their contents upon such examination if they are not produced, was proper and is in harmony with the manifest purpose of the Civil Practice Act and the Rules of Civil Practice to simplify the practice in the courts. While many of the documents sought by the notice to produce are technically in the possession of a corporation not a…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of SperryNew York Surrogate's Court · 1930
  2. O'Grady v. BurrAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1956
  3. Mill Basin Asphalt Corp. v. PiconeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API