A. Wichman & Son v. Fox
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before Prince, J., Charleston, Action by A. Wichman & Son against J. R. and S. J. Fox. Defendants appeal. cite: On the main issue: 94 S. C. 58. cite: Order not appeal-able: 17 S. C. 543; 87 S. C. 384; 73 S. C. 811; 31 S. C. 593.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Chiee Justice Gary.
This is an appeal from an order of his Pfonor, the Circuit Judge, who, in allowing the defendants further time within which to answer the com plaint, imposed, as a condition, that they should file a bond, in the sum of $3,100.00, with sufficient surety, conditioned tO’ pay the plaintiff any judgment he might recover against them, on the ground that the imposing of the condition was an abuse of discretion on the part of the Circuit Judge.
The appellant’s attorneys rely upon the case of Fitzgerald v. Case Co., 94 S. C. 54, 77 S. E.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Greenwood Drug Co. v. Bromonia Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1908
- Fitzgerald v. J. I. Case Threshing MacHine Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1913
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. SullivanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1923
- Stokes v. MurraySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1914