Legal Opinion

Johnson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 30, 1975No. 74-186PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRIMES, Judge.

At the trial which resulted in a conviction of grand larceny, the following colloquy occurred when the state called a witness to testify to the value of the items allegedly stolen.

“MR. HAWORTH: State of Florida will call Mr. Kuban, who has not been sworn.

MR. STEWART: At this time, your honor, I’d like to put an objection into the record.

THE COURT: You may.

MR. STEWART: I’d like to object to the testimony of this witness because the witness was not listed on the list of witnesses provided by the state in answer to the defendant’s demand for discovery.

THE COURT: I understand this…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Richardson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1971
  2. Ramirez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970
  3. Carnivale v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kilpatrick v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1979
  2. Cuciak v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  3. Lightsey v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API