Shearer v. State

W. SHARP, Judge.

We find no merit in this appeal from the summary denial of a motion for post-con*722viction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. The grounds for relief raised in the motion are either procedurally barred or so vague as to be legally insufficient. However, to reach the merits of this case we must find that the form of oath used by the appellant at the end of his Rule 3.850 motion was legally sufficient.

The oath used by Shearer in this appeal in connection with his 3.850 motion is headed, “OATH F.S. 92.525.” The words are: “Under the penalties of…