Legal Opinion

M'Coy v. Scott

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 1, 1828PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Error to the Court of Common Pleas of Franklin county.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court (Huston, J., dissenting,) was delivered by

Rogers, J.

— Although lands in Pennsylvania are considered as chattels for the payment of debts, yet, in the case of an intestacy, the real estate goes to the heirs, and the personal estate to the legal representatives. The security exacted from the administrator has reference to the, value of the personalty, as was decided at Sunbury, when we held, that the surety in an administration bond was not liable for the real estate. When lands are wanted for the payment of debts, there is a mode pointed out by the act of assembly,…

2Cited by16 opinions

  1. McPike v. McPikeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1892
  2. Herron ex rel. Murray v. StevensonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  3. Morrison's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
  4. Adams v. AdamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1835
  5. Bailey v. BaileySupreme Court of Vermont · 1894

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API