Legal Opinion

Gould v. Sternburg

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided November 20, 1882PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Will county; the Hon. Francis Goodspeed, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Scott

There are only two cases, under the laws of this State, in which a party may file a bill in a court of chancery to quiet title, or to remove a cloud from the title to real property: First, when he is in possession of the lands; and second, when he claims to be the owner, and the lands in controversy are unimproved and unoccupied. (Hardin v. Jones, 86 Ill. 313; Gage v. Abbott, 99 id. 366; Oakley v. Hurlbut, 100 id. 204.) This case does not come within the rule on this subject so frequently declared. The object of the bill is to have certain deeds and a mortgage cancelled, as a cloud upon the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hardin v. JonesIllinois Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Burton v. GleasonIllinois Supreme Court · 1870

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Echols v. HubbardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  2. Badger Gold Min. & Mill. Co. v. Stockton Gold & Copper Min. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon · 1905
  3. Hughey v. WinborneSupreme Court of Florida · 1902
  4. Weaver v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1885
  5. Bezely v. SearlAppellate Court of Illinois · 1923

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API