Legal Opinion

Thompson Bros. v. Cummings & Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 15, 1881PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Contracts! Cotton Futures. Principal and Agent. Actions. Before Judge STEWART. Newton Superior Court. March Term, 1881. Reported in the decision.

1Opinion of the Court

Crawford; Justice.

This suit originated on a sight draft for $364.95, drawn by Thompson Bros., on Swann & Stewart, December 12th, 1879, which they refused to pay, and Cummings & Co. sued them and Thompson Bros., the drawers.

The defence set up to this suit was—

(1.) That the draft was drawn to pay the losses upon the purchase of cotton “ futures ” from the plaintiffs, both parties knowing that there Was no cotton held by either, and that the same was nothing but a mere speculation upon chances.

' (2.) Defendants further pleaded that the plaintiffs received and were indebted to the drawers the sum…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Howell ex rel. Jones v. FountainSupreme Court of Georgia · 1847
  2. Warren, Lane & Co. v. HewittSupreme Court of Georgia · 1872

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Forsyth Manufacturing Co. v. CastlenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  2. Anderson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  3. Cunningham v. National BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1883
  4. Fortenbury v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1886
  5. Singleton v. Bank of MonticelloSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API